16 April 2026
Adolescents and breakfast
The benefits of breakfast don’t stop at age 11, yet many teens are missing it.
Written by Magic Breakfast team
Adolescence is a critical stage for development. Yet secondary school-aged children and young people (aged 11 to 18) have the worst diet quality of any age group and are more likely to miss breakfast. This matters for health and wellbeing, social belonging, life chances, and wider social and economic outcomes. Magic Breakfast commissioned Rocket Science to review the evidence on why breakfast is so beneficial for secondary-aged students, why they may be missing breakfast, and what schools and the wider system need to make breakfasts work for young people.
Our new research explores:

What breakfast means for adolescents, including the impact on their health and wellbeing, social belonging, life chances, and wider social and economic outcomes. Read more.

The complex mix of barriers that secondary-aged pupils face which means that they are less likely to have breakfast than primary-aged pupils. Read more.

Practical suggestions for schools and policy-makers to boost engagement and long-term outcomes. Read more.
What are the benefits of breakfast for adolescents?
Health and wellbeing
Adolescence is a critical stage of physical, cognitive and emotional development. Breakfast can provide adolescents with a range of nutritional benefits, including stronger overall diet quality and higher intake of key vitamins and minerals, which support healthy growth, development and progression of puberty.
Yet adolescence is also the stage at which diet quality deteriorates most, and breakfast consumption is at its lowest. Morning hunger can make it harder for young people to get the nutrients they need, which can have a negative impact on their health, wellbeing, social and educational outcomes.
| Short-term impact of poor nutrition in adolescence | Long-term impact of poor nutrition in adolescence |
| Lower overall diet quality | Risk of poor diet patterns and habits continued into adulthood |
| Greater risk of nutrient deficiencies | Problems with adult height, weight and skeletal mass |
| Development of metabolic conditions | Impacts on brain development and increased risk of diabetes, stroke and heart disease |
Teenagers who eat breakfast have reported being happier and having a higher quality of life while being less anxious and depressed.

“I’m not sure with a breakfast we are looking at the right outcomes […such as] young people’s resilience, mental wellbeing and feelings of social isolation – softer outcomes are as important.”
– Professor Greta Defeyter, Northumbria University
Case study: The benefits of breakfast provision on mental health and wellbeing
Insights from Magic Breakfast Engagement Partners and a SEND school in North East England highlight how breakfast provision supports emotional wellbeing:
- Development of life skills: Involvement in breakfast set-up and delivery gives pupils ownership and motivation to attend. It offers a ‘low stakes’ environment for young people to practice and prepare for future independence and responsibilities.
- Calm start to the day: Helps pupils settle in for the school day, creating a calmer environment and reducing anxieties and disruptions.
- Supporting vulnerable pupils: Can serve as a ‘referral touchpoint,’ providing an opportunity to check in and offer mental health and wellbeing support.
- Social connection and belonging: Provides a safe social space for pupils to get to know other students, build friendships and increase confidence.
Supporting social belonging
Secondary-aged pupils have the poorest diet quality of any age group and are the most likely to miss breakfast. Poor diets and missing breakfast have been linked to violence (fighting and aggression), low-level offences (shoplifting), and contact with the Criminal Justice System, but dietary change has the potential to positively influence behaviour.
Stopping young people going hungry also has the potential to directly impact the risks of young people being exploited.

“Food in our work is a massive driver to county lines and exploitation. Food is used to coerce young people into negative friendships.”
Programme manager at London Violence Reduction Unit (VRU) about the Mayor of London’s Holiday Hope programme.
Improving life chances
Breakfast provision can support improvements in concentration, learning, routine and punctuality. These outcomes contribute to long-term educational attainment, including improved GCSE scores and stronger engagement in learning.

“Sometimes not eating will give me a bad head and causes me to not perform well with work at college.”
– Young person
This could help to reduce the risk of young people becoming not in education, employment or training (NEET) and improve longer-term educational and workforce outcomes, however more research is needed to fully understand the long-term impact of breakfast provision on NEET rates.
Social and economic benefits
Breakfast provision supports adolescents’ health and wellbeing, strengthens social belonging and improves life chances. Together, these outcomes can contribute to improved lifetime earnings.
What barriers prevent access to breakfast for secondary-aged students?

Age and gender related self-consciousness: girls show higher rates of breakfast skipping compared to boys. This could be deliberate as a weight control strategy: weight control intentions and disordered eating behaviours are closely linked to breakfast skipping patterns.

Biological and physiological factors: biological shifts can alter sleep schedules and appetite patterns. Teenagers usually have later sleep times and feel less hungry in the morning, which contributes to a lower-quality diet overall.

“I don’t usually eat breakfast because I get out so early.”
– Young person

Food preferences and dietary patterns: many young people show preferences for unhealthy foods over relatively nutritious options available in breakfast provision. Misinformation on social media can also contribute to poor food choices and understanding the importance of breakfast.

Food intolerances and allergies: breakfast provision could be avoided by children and young people with allergies and intolerances, especially if adjustments are not made to ensure breakfast provision is accessible. Children with autism spectrum disorders are significantly more likely to have food allergies and sensory-driven food selectivity can leave neurodiverse children without safe, acceptable breakfast options in schools.

Time pressures and practical constraints: lack of time due to study pressures, job responsibilities, and long travel times can create significant barriers to having breakfast.

Activity preferences and screen time: excessive screen time especially in older children due to availability of smartphones has also been associated with irregular eating patterns and reduced breakfast consumption.

External influences: children are more likely to miss breakfast when parents do the same, and families larger than five are more likely to miss breakfast. Social dynamics in school settings can either support or discourage healthy eating behaviours, and many adolescents avoid participating in breakfast programmes to prevent being perceived as poor or different.

Economic and political factors: funding shortfalls, staffing constraints, competing priorities and existing catering contracts can act as barriers to school breakfast provision.

Breakfast club policies: the National School Breakfast Programme (NSBP), which provides subsidised breakfast food and delivery for schools in areas facing the highest levels of deprivation across England, including secondary schools, is due to end in July 2026. No Government-funded breakfast provision currently exists for mainstream secondary schools in devolved nations of the UK.

Social, cultural, and knowledge barriers: such as some schools struggle to convey the benefits of breakfast attendance with parents, leading to low uptake; school leadership may regard breakfast provision as beyond the scope of the school’s responsibilities or not as a strategic priority; educational institutions may encounter challenges in developing inclusive breakfast programmes.

Technological, legal, and environmental barriers: a lack of appropriate kitchens or dining spaces, and regulatory requirements such as food safety can create additional burdens.

Teenage lifestyle and associated challenges: decline in diet quality as young people enter adolescence, may be preferences for fast food outlets.

Inequalities: geographic disparities cause inequalities, and children and young people are disproportionately affected by food insecurity. Food insecure households may have to cut down on healthy foods due to costs.

Home lives: meal consumption and wider wellbeing can be affected by young people’s home lives, and young carers can face additional, acute challenges.

School food standards: secondary schools may not be meeting school food standards, although a lack of monitoring makes this difficult to ascertain, and most young people do not enjoy school food or feel that it is healthy.

Formation of perceptions: perceptions of food are influenced by parents, peers, the school environment, and the local built environment. Social media and targeted advertising can play a significant role in shaping young people’s understanding of nutrition and disordered eating.

Gender norms: young women and girls are exposed to a culture of over dieting and may prioritise body image over health, while young men and boys are increasingly affected by body issues and may be using steroids as young as 13.
What else is in the report?
Examples of best practice in the UK and abroad
Read case studies from a SEND school in the North East of England; Hammersmith and Fulham, and the National School Breakfast Programme; and examples of international best practice in Finland, Denmark and Brazil.
A spotlight on gaps in the evidence base
The report highlights gaps in the evidence base, and how addressing these gaps could demonstrate societal value. These include limited research on the impact of breakfast on NEET status.
Best practice suggestions for school food programmes
Well-structured school food programmes that integrate nutrition, education, and equity can deliver far-reaching benefits, from enhanced learning and health outcomes to stronger community ties and economic resilience. Learnings could be used to inform more effective breakfast provision across the UK.
Recommendations for government
- Expand and evaluate existing provision
The National School Breakfast Programme (NSBP) currently subsidises breakfast food and delivery for around 900 secondary schools in areas of high deprivation. As this provision is due to end in July 2026, there is an opportunity for the Government to build on the NSBP to evaluate the wider benefits of school breakfast for young people and apply these learnings towards establishing a long-term evidence-based programme.
- Recognise the wider impacts of school breakfast provision across multiple policy areas
School breakfast provision for secondary-aged pupils has benefits that extend far beyond the immediate positive benefits of reducing child morning hunger today. The Government should recognise breakfast provision as a cross-cutting, low-cost intervention method that can support health and wellbeing, social belonging, future opportunities and social and economic benefits.
- Ensure school food is nutritious and accessible
Government standards on school food should embed a right to accessible food that is both nutritious and inclusive, with regard for dietary needs, allergies and neurodiversity. To ensure these standards are consistently met, the Government should establish regular school food monitoring provisions in schools, with transparent reporting on compliance and quality.
You can help make sure no young person starts the school day hungry.
Support our campaign to give teenagers the best possible start to their day, and the rest of their lives.



